You should know that when I remember my father, I do not begin with his face.
I begin with the sound of him in the room.
It was not a loud sound. It did not announce itself. It was closer to the steady presence of breath, or the low confirmation that someone was still there even when nothing was being said. I learned to recognize it the way one recognizes a hearth when entering a house in winter—not by heat alone, but by the way the air settles around it.
Tata spoke rarely, and when he did, he did not hurry. His voice seemed to arrive already finished, as if it had waited its turn before entering the world. I do not remember him raising it. I remember it carrying, even when spoken quietly, the way a hand resting on a table carries more reassurance than one in motion.
As a child, I thought all fathers sounded this way. I thought steadiness was simply part of being grown. It did not occur to me that presence itself could be fragile, or that remaining might require effort. Those were distinctions I learned later, when the sound began to change.
But before that—before any of it—I knew him first by that rhythm. It was there in the mornings, when the house was still deciding whether to wake. It was there in the evenings, when work was done and words were unnecessary. Even now, when I stop long enough, I can still place it correctly in memory, the way one places a familiar object in the dark without reaching for it.
This is why I remember him at all.
Not because he was extraordinary, but because his presence taught me how to notice when something endures. Some things make noise to prove they exist. He did not need to.
Tata was most himself when nothing was required of him.
There were tasks, of course. Wood to be split, tools to be cleaned, small repairs that never announced themselves as important but always needed doing. He approached these without ceremony. I do not remember him planning his work so much as recognizing it, the way one recognizes weather. Something needed attention, so he gave it.
When he moved through
Mama's Hut, he did not fill space. He adjusted to it. Chairs were returned to where they belonged. Doors were closed carefully, not to keep anything out, but to keep warmth where it had settled. He had a habit of pausing before sitting, as if checking whether the moment had room for him. I thought this was simply patience. I did not yet understand it as listening.
He spoke to my mother differently than he spoke to me, though neither manner involved many words. With
Mama, his silences were longer. They worked alongside each other without comment, passing tools, sharing glances that required no explanation. I watched this closely, not because I felt excluded, but because it seemed complete. There was nothing for me to improve upon by interrupting it.
With me, he was deliberate. When he answered a question, he answered only what I had asked, never what I might ask next. If I wanted more, I had to find the words myself. This was not discipline. It was trust. He assumed I was capable of reaching understanding without being carried there.
Some evenings we sat together near the hearth, not speaking at all. I learned then that companionship does not always announce itself as interaction. Sometimes it is simply the agreement to remain in the same place for a while. Tata’s presence made those hours feel held, as though time itself had been persuaded to slow down.
As a child, I believed this was how homes worked. That they gathered themselves around the people who lived in them, that steadiness was the natural state of things. I did not know to be grateful. I was too busy learning how to notice.
The Place I Was Raised
The place itself did not explain anything. It did not need to.
Our home sat where forest and wet ground met, in a stretch of land that resisted being simplified. Paths existed, but they did not insist on themselves. If you walked without paying attention, you would arrive somewhere else entirely. I did not think of this as danger. It was simply how the ground behaved.
Stories were not told to entertain me. They were offered the way instructions are offered when something matters. They explained where water rose without warning, which clearings could not be trusted after dusk, and why certain sounds should be noted even when nothing followed them. I was not told to be afraid. I was taught to observe.
Mama understood this instinctively. She did not describe the world to me in advance. She let me encounter it, then corrected me only when I misunderstood something essential. From her I learned that attention is a form of care, and that most mistakes come from haste rather than ignorance. If I asked why something was done a certain way, she would often answer by doing it again, more slowly.
The house responded to this way of living. It was not large, but it did not feel small. Rooms existed where they were needed, not where symmetry would have placed them. Light entered when it was allowed to. The hearth was central, not as a symbol, but as a function. It was where tasks paused and resumed. Tata and Mama treated it with the same quiet respect they gave everything else that could not be rushed.
I learned early that not everything wanted to be named. Some things worked better when approached indirectly, when allowed to remain slightly out of focus. Silence was not absence. It was space. The forest knew this. So did the house.
Looking back, I understand that I was being taught a particular way of moving through the world. Not mastery, and not submission, but alignment. You paid attention, adjusted when necessary, and did not assume the world owed you clarity simply because you asked for it.
At the time, it felt ordinary. That was its greatest gift.
There are things I understand now that I did not understand then. This is not unusual. What matters is not the gap itself, but how gently it is crossed.
When I was young, I did not think of Tata as different. He was simply present, and presence was all I required of him. If there were limits to him, I did not recognize them as such. Children accept the boundaries of their world without argument. They assume the shape they are given is the only one that exists.
Only later did I begin to realize that Tata did not belong to the place in the way Mama did, or in the way I eventually would. He moved through our days with care, as if each one needed to be handled correctly. I mistook this for courtesy. It was something else. Remaining required attention.
There were small signs. He did not sleep as deeply as I did. He was most solid near the hearth, and quieter when he strayed too far from it. He avoided certain paths without explanation, choosing longer routes that made sense only if you were already listening for them. None of this seemed strange to me at the time. It was simply how Tata was.
Mama did not explain him to me, and I did not ask. This was not secrecy. It was timing. She understood that understanding arrives when it is ready, and that forcing it early only teaches a person to repeat words without meaning them. I learned Tata by living with him, not by being told who he was.
It was much later—after travel, after language, after I had seen enough of the world to notice its patterns—that I found better ways to think about him. Even now, I am careful. Naming can clarify, but it can also flatten. Whatever Tata was, he was first my father. That is the order in which I hold it.
At the time, none of this mattered. He was there. The house was steady. The days moved as they always had. Knowledge that arrives too early is not knowledge at all. It is noise.
I learned this part later, in pieces, and never all at once.
There were people who came to Mama before I was born. They were not from nearby, and they did not arrive easily. Finding her required patience, and the willingness to be wrong several times before being correct. By the time they reached the house, they had already done what was required of them, even if they did not yet know it.
They brought with them a problem that could not be solved by ordinary means. Something bound to them had grown too old for the shape it was kept in. It followed them not out of malice, but because that was the agreement that had been made long before any of them were alive. The binding held, but it no longer fit. What could not be undone had to be placed somewhere else.
Mama listened. She always did. She did not agree immediately, and she did not refuse quickly. She understood what they were offering her in exchange, and she refused it for the same reason she refused most things that involved permanence imposed from the outside. Too many people in one place creates noise. Noise erodes attention. Attention was the work she did.
What resolved the matter was not negotiation, but alignment. The thing that followed them was already drawn to her. Not as a conqueror, and not as a supplicant, but as something that had wandered long enough to recognize where it could rest. Whatever it had been called before, the name they used for it had thinned with time. It carried only what was necessary.
The binding was not broken. It was transferred. This mattered. It meant that what followed was not a release, but a relocation. The constraint remained. It simply settled into a different shape.
That shape was my father.
There was no ceremony worth recording. No moment that announced itself as important. Mama did what needed to be done, and the world adjusted around it. In time, I was born into the space that decision created.
When I think back on this now, I do not frame it as sacrifice. No one involved believed they were giving something up. They believed they were solving a problem in the only way that remained. Tragedy, when it came, arrived later, as consequence does. At the beginning, there was only continuity.
Thinning
It did not happen all at once, and that is why I did not recognize it for what it was.
Tata was still there. He still worked, still sat with me, still spoke when it mattered. But there were small adjustments that accumulated quietly, the way a room changes shape when furniture is moved an inch at a time. If you lived inside it, you adapted without noticing.
He began to arrive later in the day. Not absent—never absent—but as if distance had grown where none had been before. Sometimes he would pause at the threshold of the house, resting his hand against the doorframe longer than necessary, as though checking whether it would hold him. I thought this was habit. I was wrong.
The time he could remain with us shortened, though not predictably. Some days he stayed until night had fully settled. Other days he faded before the light had finished leaving the trees. Mama noticed before I did. She adjusted the rhythm of the house without comment, shifting meals, tasks, silences. Nothing was explained. Nothing needed to be.
When Tata spoke during this time, his voice did not weaken, but it carried differently. It was still steady, still sure, but it felt as though it was being held in place rather than resting there naturally. As if remaining required attention, and attention was becoming costly.
I asked once whether he was tired. He considered this carefully before answering. Then he said that tired was not the right word. I accepted this without argument. He had never offered answers that were not precise.
The visits grew shorter. The pauses grew longer. There were evenings when the hearth burned and Tata did not sit near it, not because he did not wish to, but because he could not. I did not yet understand that presence itself was becoming conditional.
When he was gone, he was not gone in the way people mean when they say the word. He did not leave behind urgency or disorder. The house remained steady. Mama remained herself. Only the shape of our days altered, subtly, as though something essential had been removed and the world was learning how to hold without it.
At the time, I did not call this loss. I had no language for it. I only knew that something was being asked of us, and that we were answering as carefully as we could.
There was no moment that announced itself as final.
Tata did not come one day, and then he did not come the next. At first this felt ordinary. His presence had already learned to be intermittent, and I waited for it to resume the way it always had. Mama did not correct me. She rarely corrected things that needed time to be understood.
The house adjusted more than I did. Tasks shifted. Silences lengthened. The hearth was tended with the same care as before, but its center felt wider, as though it now held more than warmth alone. I noticed these changes without naming them. Children are good at that. We feel difference long before we understand it.
Mama did not speak of Tata as absent. She spoke of him as finished. This was not said aloud, but carried in the way she worked, in the way she paused before certain tasks and then continued anyway. There was no collapse. No grief displayed for instruction. Whatever had been required of her, she met it without making a lesson of it.
I did not feel abandoned. That would have required surprise. What I felt was responsibility. Tata had thinned carefully, deliberately, until nothing remained that could be held. Remembering him became the only way I could still participate in what he had been. I did not resent this. It felt correct.
There were things I stopped doing. Questions I no longer asked. Not because answers were forbidden, but because they were no longer necessary. The world had changed its terms, and Mama and I accepted them without argument. We had been raised to do so.
In time, I understood that love does not always insist on remaining. Sometimes it completes itself and leaves no work undone. Tata had not failed to stay. He had stayed as long as he could.
This understanding did not come all at once. It settled slowly, the way snow settles after the wind has finished moving it. Even now, I do not think of that period as one of loss. I think of it as the moment when memory became something I was expected to carry forward, rather than something shared.
Leaving
After Tata was gone, I began to spend more time at the edge of the forest.
This was not a decision so much as a drift. The house remained steady, but it no longer contained all the shapes of attention I had learned to recognize. I was old enough to notice that something was missing, but not old enough to understand what kind of absence it was. When that happens, the body often moves before the mind does.
There was a man who lived alone beyond the trees, where the ground rose slightly and the wetness thinned. He kept a small holding and spoke little, which I took as familiarity. I did not know then how easily silence can be misread when its reasons are not shared.
I helped him with ordinary work. Carrying water. Mending a fence. Standing nearby while tasks were completed. These were things Tata had taught me without naming them as lessons. Doing them again felt like continuity. I did not think of the farmer as a replacement. I thought of him as practice.
He spoke to me differently than Tata had. He asked questions that reached beyond what I had offered. When I did not answer, he filled the space himself. I did not yet understand that this was a kind of reaching. I assumed he was simply unaccustomed to company.
The misunderstanding took time to form. It arrived gradually, through tone rather than action, through expectations I did not know I was creating. By the time I recognized it, it had already settled into something neither of us had intended. I had been seeking structure. He had been seeking something else.
I do not remember his name.
This does not trouble me. Names belong to relationships that endure. What existed between us was temporary by design, even if neither of us knew it at the time. When the arrangement collapsed under the weight of its misalignment, there was no single moment to point to. Only the quiet certainty that something necessary had failed to translate.
Mama understood before I told her. She always did. She did not speak of blame, and she did not ask for detail. She watched me closely for a long time, and then she began to prepare for something I had not yet realized was coming.
Then we stay with the night, and let it do its work.
Mama did not tell me I was leaving.
She began instead by asking what I had noticed. Not what I thought, and not what I felt, but what I had seen change. This was how she had always spoken when something mattered. I answered carefully. I told her about the farmer, about the way the days had begun to feel misaligned, about the sense that I was repeating something without understanding why. She listened without interruption, her attention steady and complete.
When I finished, she nodded once. There was no relief in this, and no disappointment. Only recognition.
We spoke through the night. Not continuously. There were long pauses where the fire was tended, water heated, bread broken. Advice was given the way it had always been given in that house: embedded in ordinary action. She told me how to walk without drawing notice. How to listen before deciding where to stay. Which kinds of people required distance even when they seemed kind. Which questions were worth answering, and which were better left unanswered.
She did not speak of danger. She spoke of pattern. She reminded me that not every place is meant to hold you, and that remaining too long can damage both the one who stays and the place that receives them. I understood then that the house had not expelled me. It had finished raising me.
Near dawn, she packed what I would need. Food wrapped carefully. Clothes chosen for utility rather than familiarity. A few tools whose purposes would reveal themselves later. She worked without haste. Nothing was forgotten. Nothing was sentimental.
Before the light fully returned, she placed her hands on my shoulders and looked at me for a long time. There was no blessing, and no warning. Only a quiet certainty shared between us. I could return. I could visit. But I could not stay.
I accepted this without protest. Not because I wanted to leave, but because I recognized the instruction when it was finally given. Some thresholds cannot be crossed twice in the same direction.
Morning arrived without ceremony.
The light was thin and pale, as if it had not yet decided how much of itself to give the day. Mama had already been awake for some time. The house was quiet in the way it became only after decisions had been made. My pack waited by the door, settled and complete.
We did not speak much. There was nothing left to arrange. I ate what was set before me. She watched, not to hurry me, but to make sure I was present. When I finished, I stood. She nodded. That was enough.
At the threshold, I paused. This was habit, not hesitation. I placed my hand against the frame, the same way Tata had. The wood was cool. It held. I did not look back to see whether the house would remember me. I trusted that it would.
The path did not announce itself. It never had. I followed it anyway, adjusting when the ground shifted, listening when the forest redirected me. By the time the house was no longer visible, I had already entered the work of moving forward. The world widened gradually, without asking whether I was ready.
I did not feel brave. I did not feel afraid. What I felt was oriented. The instruction had been given. I was carrying what I had been raised to carry, and leaving behind what could no longer come with me.
I did not leave Tata there. He had already finished remaining. What he had taught me traveled easily. It settled into my steps, my breath, the way I listened before speaking. Presence does not require proximity. Some things endure by moving with you.
I have walked many roads since then. I have known other houses, other voices, other silences. Still, when I stop long enough, I can feel the rhythm that first taught me how to notice what lasts.
That is how I remember my father.
Comments