Thalen
Thalen was a minor god in the Thauzunian Orthodoxy, associated with strategy, planning, and the deliberate use of patience over force. In pre-Fall belief, Thalen was not concerned with battle itself, nor with command or authority. His domain lay entirely in preparation: deciding when to act, where to act, and just as importantly, when not to act at all. He represented foresight rather than power, calculation rather than action.
Orthodox doctrine treated Thalen as a supplementary figure within systems of war, governance, and long-term decision-making. He was invoked indirectly through planning councils, logistical preparation, and institutional foresight rather than through public ritual or mass devotion. Unlike major gods tied to law or command, Thalen did not legitimize outcomes. A plan could be flawless and still fail; his role was to ensure that failure resulted from circumstance rather than negligence. He embodied restraint, delay, and the discipline of thinking beyond immediate advantage.
Thalen was understood to operate quietly. He was not associated with prophecy, inspiration, or divine insight. Strategy under Thalen was learned, refined, and corrected through experience. Orthodox teachings emphasized that reliance on divine guidance was a weakness in his domain; careful observation, recordkeeping, and adaptation were considered the proper expressions of his influence. In this sense, Thalen reinforced the Orthodoxy’s broader emphasis on responsibility and institutional competence rather than divine intervention.
No knowledge of Thalen survives into the post-Fall era. There are no remaining references to his name, role, symbols, or rites in modern Vey’Zari society. The Thauzunian Orthodoxy itself is entirely unknown, and with its disappearance, all structured understanding of Thalen vanished. He does not appear in contemporary military doctrine, political theory, or reconstructed mythology.
As a result, Thalen is not remembered, worshiped, or reinterpreted in any form. There are no surviving cults, degraded traditions, or symbolic remnants associated with him. To modern Vey’Zari, Thalen is not a forgotten god but an entirely unknown one, his existence accessible only through speculative reconstruction of pre-Fall religious structure rather than through any living memory or cultural awareness.
Orthodox doctrine treated Thalen as a supplementary figure within systems of war, governance, and long-term decision-making. He was invoked indirectly through planning councils, logistical preparation, and institutional foresight rather than through public ritual or mass devotion. Unlike major gods tied to law or command, Thalen did not legitimize outcomes. A plan could be flawless and still fail; his role was to ensure that failure resulted from circumstance rather than negligence. He embodied restraint, delay, and the discipline of thinking beyond immediate advantage.
Thalen was understood to operate quietly. He was not associated with prophecy, inspiration, or divine insight. Strategy under Thalen was learned, refined, and corrected through experience. Orthodox teachings emphasized that reliance on divine guidance was a weakness in his domain; careful observation, recordkeeping, and adaptation were considered the proper expressions of his influence. In this sense, Thalen reinforced the Orthodoxy’s broader emphasis on responsibility and institutional competence rather than divine intervention.
No knowledge of Thalen survives into the post-Fall era. There are no remaining references to his name, role, symbols, or rites in modern Vey’Zari society. The Thauzunian Orthodoxy itself is entirely unknown, and with its disappearance, all structured understanding of Thalen vanished. He does not appear in contemporary military doctrine, political theory, or reconstructed mythology.
As a result, Thalen is not remembered, worshiped, or reinterpreted in any form. There are no surviving cults, degraded traditions, or symbolic remnants associated with him. To modern Vey’Zari, Thalen is not a forgotten god but an entirely unknown one, his existence accessible only through speculative reconstruction of pre-Fall religious structure rather than through any living memory or cultural awareness.
Children
Comments