Rekdel Family
Rekdel Family
Classification
Pre-Fall Lineage
Earliest Known Origin542 CE (Exact records fragmented)
Status Before the FallImperial-sanctioned historians, archivists, and doctrinal auditors
Impact of the FallSevere demographic loss through targeted purges and archival destruction. Public Rekdel records largely erased, but select private archives and mnemonic traditions survived.
Current StandingActive; critically diminished
House HeadNone (Decentralized lineage; no recognized patriarch or matriarch)
Primary AdversariesRav’thuun Syndicate: Views the Rekdel bloodline as a latent existential threat due to unauthorized Pre-Fall research and doctrinal divergence.
Torvynn Family: Indirect adversary through systemic historical suppression and enforcement actions
House ReputationDangerous intellectuals; unaligned truth-keepers
Associated with forbidden historical inquiry, recovered Pre-Fall religious texts, and challenges to Rav’thuun’s narrative of the Fall
Quietly hunted, rarely confronted openly
Current Power RatingLow (material and political)
High (informational and ideological risk)
Historical Trajectory
Post-Fall Survival
Rekdel survivors abandon centralized archives, preserving knowledge through oral doctrine, encrypted marginalia, and dispersed artifact caches. Family transitions from imperial functionaries to clandestine historians.
Reconstruction & Middle Eras (c. 1000–1800)Periodic reintegration into syndicate historical projects, followed by repeated purges when contradictions emerge. Family develops refined concealment practices and decentralized lineage continuity.
Modern EraThe Rekdel name persists as a suppressed classification rather than a recognized house. Surviving members operate as independent historians, drifters, and artifact scavengers. Rav’thuun internal doctrine identifies Rekdel-derived knowledge as “contamination risk,” confirming the bloodline’s continued relevance—and danger—to Rav'thuun control of history.

Comments