Korrin
Korrin was a major god in the Thauzunian Orthodoxy, associated with councils, governance, and collective decision-making. In pre-Fall belief, Korrin did not represent leadership or authority in a personal sense, but the process by which authority was exercised collectively. His domain lay in assemblies, committees, and institutional deliberation rather than in individual rulers or decrees.
Orthodox doctrine treated governance as a function of structure rather than charisma. Decisions made through councils were considered more stable and legitimate than those made unilaterally. Korrin embodied the belief that systems endured longer than individuals, and that governance required procedure, debate, and recorded consensus. His influence was present wherever power was distributed rather than concentrated.
Korrin was closely tied to bureaucracy, minutes, and formal procedure. Meetings held without records or clear outcomes were considered failures of governance. Pre-Fall teachings emphasized that disagreement was acceptable, even expected, so long as it occurred within structured deliberation. Disorder arose not from conflict, but from the absence of process. In this way, Korrin reinforced the Orthodoxy’s emphasis on institutional continuity.
No knowledge of Korrin survives into the post-Fall era. There are no remaining references to his name, symbols, or associated practices in modern Vey’Zari society. The Thauzunian Orthodoxy itself is unknown, and with its collapse, all formal understanding of Korrin disappeared. He is not remembered, worshiped, or reinterpreted in any capacity, leaving no cultural or symbolic residue.
Orthodox doctrine treated governance as a function of structure rather than charisma. Decisions made through councils were considered more stable and legitimate than those made unilaterally. Korrin embodied the belief that systems endured longer than individuals, and that governance required procedure, debate, and recorded consensus. His influence was present wherever power was distributed rather than concentrated.
Korrin was closely tied to bureaucracy, minutes, and formal procedure. Meetings held without records or clear outcomes were considered failures of governance. Pre-Fall teachings emphasized that disagreement was acceptable, even expected, so long as it occurred within structured deliberation. Disorder arose not from conflict, but from the absence of process. In this way, Korrin reinforced the Orthodoxy’s emphasis on institutional continuity.
No knowledge of Korrin survives into the post-Fall era. There are no remaining references to his name, symbols, or associated practices in modern Vey’Zari society. The Thauzunian Orthodoxy itself is unknown, and with its collapse, all formal understanding of Korrin disappeared. He is not remembered, worshiped, or reinterpreted in any capacity, leaving no cultural or symbolic residue.
Children

Comments