Verdant Concordances
The Verdant Concordances are a network of realm-by-realm treaties that define the lawful place of the Brethren Court in the world: where they may go, what they may do, what they must not do, and what a crown must do when sacred land—or the Rift—is at stake. Like the Edicts Arcanum and the Accords of the Last Vigil, the Concordances are not supernaturally binding; they endure because famine, flood, blight, and war have taught the signatories what happens when land and governance drift out of balance.
Each individual treaty is called a Concord. No two Concords are identical—coastal realms negotiate fisheries and storm rites; mountain kingdoms negotiate quarry law and ashfall protocols; frontier marches negotiate settlement creep and refugee corridors. Collectively, these agreements aim to prevent the same recurring catastrophe: rulers acting too late, and the Court responding with force because diplomacy arrived after the damage was done.
Where the Edicts regulate the practice of magic and the Accords regulate the use of the Vigil against Rift threats, the Verdant Concordances regulate the practice of stewardship: they grant the Court defined freedom of movement, formal political access through the Agrarian, and enforceable protection for Worldstream Shrines and other sacred sites—while placing hard limits on the Court’s authority to prevent it from becoming an unaccountable power.
Recognition of the Court. The Brethren Court is recognized as a transregional stewardship covenant: independent of crowns in its internal rites and discipline, but not a sovereign nation and not a territorial power.
The Charter of Balance. Court members are bound by the Charter of Balance. A signatory realm recognizes the Charter as binding upon Court members operating within its borders, and agrees that Charter violations by Court members may be tried by Court process (with civil observers where the Concord requires).
Limits of Claim. The Court may not levy taxes, claim civil jurisdiction over nonmembers, or seize settled holdings by right. It may, however, declare sacred emergencies and invoke Concord procedures to prevent irreversible harm.
Neutral Sanctums. Sites named in a Concord as protected shrines, sanctums, or refuge-groves are recognized as neutral under Concord law: they are not to be besieged, occupied, or repurposed as engines of war or industry except by unanimous emergency agreement of the local signatories.
Seat and Standing. A signatory realm agrees to host an office titled Agrarian, seated upon its highest council (royal council, high council, senate, or equivalent), with standing to speak on agriculture, water, land use, forestry, fisheries, mineral extraction, and shrine protection.
Appointment. The Agrarian is appointed by the Court (typically through its elder diplomacy), then affirmed according to the realm’s Concord procedures. A realm may refuse a nominee once, with stated cause; repeated refusal triggers formal Concord dispute review.
Duties to the Realm. The Agrarian is obligated to provide practical counsel: soil and water stability, famine mitigation, sustainable yield planning, restoration requirements, and crisis forecasting. The Concords make clear that “magic does not fix everything,” but wise stewardship prevents many disasters from becoming unfixable.
Duties to the Court. The Agrarian must report violations of shrine protections, taint trafficking, and reckless extraction to the appropriate chapters; must seek remedy through Concord law before any escalation; and must not use their seat to advance personal power or factional intrigue.
The Green Interdict. Most Concords grant the Agrarian authority to invoke a limited pause—commonly called a Green Interdict—upon a specific action that risks irreversible harm (clear-cut in a protected corridor, excavation near a shrine-belt, forced relocation into a sanctuary sphere, and similar). An Interdict is time-bound and triggers an immediate Keeper review with witnesses; it cannot be used to stall ordinary politics.
Confidentiality and Witness. The Agrarian may carry sealed reports between crown and Court. Abuse of confidentiality to hide crimes is itself a breach of Concord, subject to censure, removal, and tribunal.
Right of Passage. Court agents acting under Charter duty are entitled to cross borders and traverse roads, rivers, seas, and wilderness routes within signatory realms for the following purposes only:
Limited Roaming Mandate. Many Concords grant a semi-blanket roaming mandate across lands not presently inhabited by settlements and not actively used by civilization (wildwood, uplands, deep marsh, high passes), while explicitly excluding worked farm land, civic commons, and settled holdings without permission.
Limits of Action. Passage and roaming do not authorize the Court to police ordinary crime, enforce moral doctrine, or intervene in succession disputes. Use of Concord authority for purely mortal politics is grounds for censure and Concord tribunal.
Worldstream Shrines Defined. A Worldstream Shrine is an ancient sanctum—often a standing-stone complex, cairn-field, root-arch, or ringed hollow—that predates recorded history and marks a place where the Worldstream runs close enough to be heard. A Concord may name specific shrines (public or sealed) and define their protected spheres.
Managed Access. Where shrines are known to the public, the Concord defines pilgrimage rules: approach routes, seasonal closures, limits on gathering, and Keeper-led rites required for entry. Most shrines are remote by nature; when they are not, the Concord treats access as a matter of public safety as much as faith.
Prohibition on Harvesting. Extraction, siphoning, quarrying of shrine-stone, spirit bondage, and any attempt to turn a shrine into an engine of power is prohibited. In Concord language, shrines may be listened to; they may not be harvested.
Sanctuary Protocol. In war, plague, or Rift crisis, a protected shrine may serve as refuge under strict rules: no militarization, no stockpiling taint, no weaponizing rites. Wilders may hold perimeters; Keepers may stabilize; Pathfinders may guide evacuees.
Desecration and Restitution. Desecration triggers mandatory restitution: repair of wards, restoration labor, seizure of illicit harvest, and—where harm is deep—long-term binding obligations enforced through Concord tribunal.
Sustainable Work. The Concord may authorize regulated forestry, quarrying, mining, fishing, and waterworks so long as limits, seasons, and repayment obligations are specified and enforced.
Repayment Requirements. If a realm profits from extraction within recognized spheres, it must fund restoration: replanting, watershed stabilization, corridor repair, refuge maintenance, and long-term monitoring where needed.
Seizure and Interdiction. If prohibited extraction occurs within protected spheres, the Court may interdict worksites and seize illicit harvest under Concord procedure, favoring disabling capability over bloodshed where possible.
Restoration First. Concord remedies prioritize repair over punishment for first offenses committed in ignorance. Repeat offenders, concealed harms, and shrine violations escalate rapidly.
Coordination with the Edicts Arcanum. Signatory realms acknowledge the Edicts’ regulation of Arcane practice, and the Concords require that any arcane work performed near protected shrines, sanctums, or Worldstream spheres follows heightened oversight.
Coordination with the Accords of the Last Vigil. The Concordances recognize that Rift crises may require Warden intervention, and establish liaison protocols: shared witness, shared routes, and joint emergency planning, while preserving the Court’s distinct mandate of land-stabilization and restoration.
Faith and Temple Standing. Major faith authorities may be named as observers or arbiters in disputes involving pilgrimage sites, sanctuary protocols, or crimes of desecration—so that shrine conflicts do not become holy wars by accident.
Revision Councils. Concords are reviewed at fixed intervals or upon petition after major disasters, war, or Rift events. Amendments require signatory assent according to each realm’s procedures, with the Court retaining veto on any change that would permit shrine harvesting or taint commerce.
Record and Copies. Each signatory realm maintains a sealed copy of its Concord. The Court maintains its own annotated copies, recording precedents, violations, and judgments—often both as written archive and as case-song witness, so that paper loss does not erase law.
Dispute Tribunals. When conflicts cannot be settled locally, the Concord defines a tribunal structure (civil authority, Court elders, and named observers) empowered to adjudicate breaches and assign restitution.
Enduring Purpose. Every Concord ends on the same premise: civilization may grow, but it must grow in a way the world can survive. The Concordances exist to place stewardship where it belongs—inside policy, not outside it—so that the Court does not have to choose between watching the land die and stopping it by force.
Each individual treaty is called a Concord. No two Concords are identical—coastal realms negotiate fisheries and storm rites; mountain kingdoms negotiate quarry law and ashfall protocols; frontier marches negotiate settlement creep and refugee corridors. Collectively, these agreements aim to prevent the same recurring catastrophe: rulers acting too late, and the Court responding with force because diplomacy arrived after the damage was done.
Where the Edicts regulate the practice of magic and the Accords regulate the use of the Vigil against Rift threats, the Verdant Concordances regulate the practice of stewardship: they grant the Court defined freedom of movement, formal political access through the Agrarian, and enforceable protection for Worldstream Shrines and other sacred sites—while placing hard limits on the Court’s authority to prevent it from becoming an unaccountable power.
I. Articles of Recognition
The Articles of Recognition establish the legal status of the Brethren Court within signatory realms, acknowledging that the Court cannot function if every chapter must beg permission at each border while a blight spreads.Recognition of the Court. The Brethren Court is recognized as a transregional stewardship covenant: independent of crowns in its internal rites and discipline, but not a sovereign nation and not a territorial power.
The Charter of Balance. Court members are bound by the Charter of Balance. A signatory realm recognizes the Charter as binding upon Court members operating within its borders, and agrees that Charter violations by Court members may be tried by Court process (with civil observers where the Concord requires).
Limits of Claim. The Court may not levy taxes, claim civil jurisdiction over nonmembers, or seize settled holdings by right. It may, however, declare sacred emergencies and invoke Concord procedures to prevent irreversible harm.
Neutral Sanctums. Sites named in a Concord as protected shrines, sanctums, or refuge-groves are recognized as neutral under Concord law: they are not to be besieged, occupied, or repurposed as engines of war or industry except by unanimous emergency agreement of the local signatories.
II. Articles of the Agrarian
The Articles of the Agrarian establish the Court’s primary instrument of diplomacy: a sworn advisor placed near top leadership so that stewardship shapes policy before crisis demands interdiction.Seat and Standing. A signatory realm agrees to host an office titled Agrarian, seated upon its highest council (royal council, high council, senate, or equivalent), with standing to speak on agriculture, water, land use, forestry, fisheries, mineral extraction, and shrine protection.
Appointment. The Agrarian is appointed by the Court (typically through its elder diplomacy), then affirmed according to the realm’s Concord procedures. A realm may refuse a nominee once, with stated cause; repeated refusal triggers formal Concord dispute review.
Duties to the Realm. The Agrarian is obligated to provide practical counsel: soil and water stability, famine mitigation, sustainable yield planning, restoration requirements, and crisis forecasting. The Concords make clear that “magic does not fix everything,” but wise stewardship prevents many disasters from becoming unfixable.
Duties to the Court. The Agrarian must report violations of shrine protections, taint trafficking, and reckless extraction to the appropriate chapters; must seek remedy through Concord law before any escalation; and must not use their seat to advance personal power or factional intrigue.
The Green Interdict. Most Concords grant the Agrarian authority to invoke a limited pause—commonly called a Green Interdict—upon a specific action that risks irreversible harm (clear-cut in a protected corridor, excavation near a shrine-belt, forced relocation into a sanctuary sphere, and similar). An Interdict is time-bound and triggers an immediate Keeper review with witnesses; it cannot be used to stall ordinary politics.
Confidentiality and Witness. The Agrarian may carry sealed reports between crown and Court. Abuse of confidentiality to hide crimes is itself a breach of Concord, subject to censure, removal, and tribunal.
III. Articles of Passage and Roaming
These articles grant the Court the minimum freedom of movement required to keep shrines stable and respond to blight or Rift incursions before they become wars—while preventing the Court from turning passage into occupation.Right of Passage. Court agents acting under Charter duty are entitled to cross borders and traverse roads, rivers, seas, and wilderness routes within signatory realms for the following purposes only:
- defense and maintenance of protected shrines and sanctums,
- response to Rift-taint and related emergencies,
- emergency mediation where land-collapse threatens civil stability,
- investigation and witness-gathering for Concord breaches.
Limited Roaming Mandate. Many Concords grant a semi-blanket roaming mandate across lands not presently inhabited by settlements and not actively used by civilization (wildwood, uplands, deep marsh, high passes), while explicitly excluding worked farm land, civic commons, and settled holdings without permission.
Limits of Action. Passage and roaming do not authorize the Court to police ordinary crime, enforce moral doctrine, or intervene in succession disputes. Use of Concord authority for purely mortal politics is grounds for censure and Concord tribunal.
IV. Articles of Shrines and Sacred Places
The Articles of Shrines define what is protected, how protection functions in practice, and what restitution is owed when sacred law is broken.Worldstream Shrines Defined. A Worldstream Shrine is an ancient sanctum—often a standing-stone complex, cairn-field, root-arch, or ringed hollow—that predates recorded history and marks a place where the Worldstream runs close enough to be heard. A Concord may name specific shrines (public or sealed) and define their protected spheres.
Managed Access. Where shrines are known to the public, the Concord defines pilgrimage rules: approach routes, seasonal closures, limits on gathering, and Keeper-led rites required for entry. Most shrines are remote by nature; when they are not, the Concord treats access as a matter of public safety as much as faith.
Prohibition on Harvesting. Extraction, siphoning, quarrying of shrine-stone, spirit bondage, and any attempt to turn a shrine into an engine of power is prohibited. In Concord language, shrines may be listened to; they may not be harvested.
Sanctuary Protocol. In war, plague, or Rift crisis, a protected shrine may serve as refuge under strict rules: no militarization, no stockpiling taint, no weaponizing rites. Wilders may hold perimeters; Keepers may stabilize; Pathfinders may guide evacuees.
Desecration and Restitution. Desecration triggers mandatory restitution: repair of wards, restoration labor, seizure of illicit harvest, and—where harm is deep—long-term binding obligations enforced through Concord tribunal.
V. Articles of Extraction and Restoration
These articles define the Court’s core bargain with civilization: work may continue, but not at the cost of collapse.Sustainable Work. The Concord may authorize regulated forestry, quarrying, mining, fishing, and waterworks so long as limits, seasons, and repayment obligations are specified and enforced.
Repayment Requirements. If a realm profits from extraction within recognized spheres, it must fund restoration: replanting, watershed stabilization, corridor repair, refuge maintenance, and long-term monitoring where needed.
Seizure and Interdiction. If prohibited extraction occurs within protected spheres, the Court may interdict worksites and seize illicit harvest under Concord procedure, favoring disabling capability over bloodshed where possible.
Restoration First. Concord remedies prioritize repair over punishment for first offenses committed in ignorance. Repeat offenders, concealed harms, and shrine violations escalate rapidly.
VI. Articles of Concord with Other Great Compacts
These articles bind the Verdant Concordances to the broader legal architecture of the age, reducing factional conflict when the world is already burning.Coordination with the Edicts Arcanum. Signatory realms acknowledge the Edicts’ regulation of Arcane practice, and the Concords require that any arcane work performed near protected shrines, sanctums, or Worldstream spheres follows heightened oversight.
Coordination with the Accords of the Last Vigil. The Concordances recognize that Rift crises may require Warden intervention, and establish liaison protocols: shared witness, shared routes, and joint emergency planning, while preserving the Court’s distinct mandate of land-stabilization and restoration.
Faith and Temple Standing. Major faith authorities may be named as observers or arbiters in disputes involving pilgrimage sites, sanctuary protocols, or crimes of desecration—so that shrine conflicts do not become holy wars by accident.
VII. Articles of Revision and Witness
The Concordances assume the world will change. They also assume memory will be contested. These articles exist so the treaties can adapt without losing their spine.Revision Councils. Concords are reviewed at fixed intervals or upon petition after major disasters, war, or Rift events. Amendments require signatory assent according to each realm’s procedures, with the Court retaining veto on any change that would permit shrine harvesting or taint commerce.
Record and Copies. Each signatory realm maintains a sealed copy of its Concord. The Court maintains its own annotated copies, recording precedents, violations, and judgments—often both as written archive and as case-song witness, so that paper loss does not erase law.
Dispute Tribunals. When conflicts cannot be settled locally, the Concord defines a tribunal structure (civil authority, Court elders, and named observers) empowered to adjudicate breaches and assign restitution.
Enduring Purpose. Every Concord ends on the same premise: civilization may grow, but it must grow in a way the world can survive. The Concordances exist to place stewardship where it belongs—inside policy, not outside it—so that the Court does not have to choose between watching the land die and stopping it by force.
Comments